YN50/1.8 vs Nikkor 35-70 3.3/4.5 – sharpness comparison
I started wondering if cheap YN lens can be compared with with some cheap Nikkor lens. Yes it can. I shoot same lens cap with Nikon D200 with these two lenses with are Yongnuo 50mm/f1.8 and Nikkor 35 – 70mm f3.3/4.5. I think that comparing fixed lens with zoom lens might be weird, but originally I though that even with zoom, Nikkor should be better. I was wrong. If anyone is not convinced why should you buy fixed-focus prime lens below you have practical explanation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a40/b5a4032120e51411e83f4c2e3fd3ef2281194b6b" alt=""
The reason why I even bother to compare them at such a level is that I was disappointed with the Nikkor lens. It produces flat output. I would not say that it is blurry but it is much less vibrant as cheap Chinese fixed lens. Which is somehow interesting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38ef0/38ef07346e03c6cfc3fb6b5f6925dd960f72ff6e" alt=""
As shown below on two samples YN produces much better image which is sharp with plenty of details. Nikkor produces image which is a little softer with less color details.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d431e/d431e0e06b1a1c71383c0980f0716569de39fbbd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9024f/9024f8aab0d63c73c171d64b42a2ac4fef7e71b9" alt=""
As a conclusion I should say that maybe comparing fixed lens with zoom is exaggeration, but it is nice to know that there are such differences.